Oh and we get all the DLC, I'm not sure how many hours I sunk in between two games of Skyrim but I still never managed to get Nashton: I'm not too up on mods at all, only from what my friend tells me about on PC but they seem interesting. Oh well, if Skyrim has as many bugs & glitches as people say, why the hell. The statement they made sounds like nothing but an excuse to not give PS3 users this DLC. It will be playable in 5 years time on my Xbox One, I can use mods now (why no just get a PC? I have one and prefer to game on a console), the graphics will be a but better (bonus for me, not a selling point) and I hope the loading times will be greatly improved. Now, I picked up MVC3 (free+no DLC), UMVC3 (used), SFxTekken (havent picked it up, yet). One could argue: Why not just make it backwards compatible? True but I'll buy the game because Skyrim is worth it, especially when it comes to bang for your buck. Now, I can play it on my Xbox One which I'm happy about and the graphics have been bumped up a bit. I mean I would happily play Skyrim on a 360 with the 360 graphics but I think, like many others out there, I sold my Xbox and I'v been dying to play a bit of Skyrim. Probably because mods can make the original look 100x better than the remastered version. But does Skyrim really need a remaster? It's only five years old.Īpparently PC players get it for free.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |